[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: [pygame] The gsoc physics module, bug fixing?



Hi Peter,
 
Thank you for your lasting attention on this project. The current main coding phase is about to end in some days later. There are still some bugs, Marcus and I are still working for cleaning them up in these days. And documentation will be done after it, then the working module will come to be tested publicly.
 
Best Wishes
Zhang Fan

Peter Gebauer <peter.gebauer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 写道:
Hi Zhang Fan!

Updated from SVN and tested the new Python joint test, very cool indeed.
Nice to see the project grow into a working module. Just wanted to let you
know I appreciate your work! Looking forward to making a test/example game
using it. :)

/Peter

On 2008-07-09 (Wed) 20:48, 帆 张 wrote:
> Hi Peter,
>
> Thanks for your careful attention to my works :-)
> I use OpenGL just for testing physics algorithms in C because this's no need for python wrapper, I can focus more on finishing algorithms first. Of course, finally, this testing method will be abandoned, which means glut is no need to link.
> Currently I start with some works about python wrapping, and I finished some codes and extended some basic functions for python wrapping. The python test file "test1.py" is being under test, and there are some bugs in python wrapping. I plan to publish my work to the community when these basic works have been done.
>
> Best wishes
> Zhang Fan
>
>
> Peter Gebauer 写道:
> Hi guys!
>
> I noticed a lot has happened, but very little communication here, is
> everything going alright? :)
> There's a new test1.py suggesting there would be Python side testing
> available, but I keep getting
>
> ImportError: ./build/lib.linux-x86_64-2.5/physics.so: undefined symbol:
> glutBitmap9By15
>
> when trying to import the physics module.
>
> Is it necessary to link glut (or whatever is needed) to test? Or should I
> just hold my horses and settle down for a while longer?
>
> /Peter
>
>
> On 2008-06-29 (Sun) 15:30, Marcus von Appen wrote:
> > On, Sun Jun 29, 2008, Peter Gebauer wrote:
> >
> > > Hi Zhang and others!
> >
> > [Python wrapper issues]
> >
> > The wrapper implementation is not really started yet, so it's a bit
> > early. In order to keep argument parsing flexible, I'd recommend using
> > METH_VARARGS and PyArg_ParseTuple() instead of the _0, ... macros. This
> > let's one easily enhance anything without the need to change too much
> > code. Additionally you can let the parser handle argument checking
> > without the need to deal with ex- or implicit object conversions.
> >
> > Regards
> > Marcus
>
>
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------
> 雅虎邮箱,您的终生邮箱!


雅虎邮箱,您的终生邮箱!