[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: [pygame] consistent heartbeats

To: pygame-users@xxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [pygame] consistent heartbeats
From: "andrew baker" <failrate@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 9 Jun 2006 21:07:08 -0700
Delivered-to: archiver@seul.org
Delivered-to: pygame-users-outgoing@seul.org
Delivered-to: pygame-users@seul.org
Delivery-date: Sat, 10 Jun 2006 00:07:26 -0400
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=JyBmKJlpqdP6RgiJBlYkcnwxyG7kz63gJvAAmm2P2sfjmOWh0kZK7qwedA0aMwUWj2eXKXMK4miaGcEdNIOgewMkIWmvEH8B7W7Eum4mhVSdXkaLOeh6iFgX4eity+BZkZjqh9iWvKNBmzFCXpCFm/TKrRBlO7iqs7wsb8SMKzs=
In-reply-to: <BAY113-F39473B32A197F0DEEC19E8B7890@phx.gbl>
References: <BAY113-F39473B32A197F0DEEC19E8B7890@phx.gbl>
Reply-to: pygame-users@xxxxxxxx
Sender: owner-pygame-users@xxxxxxxx

ImageGrab() FYI). You're referring to PIL's ImageGrab(), innit? In my experience, I couldn't even get PIL to grab a large image more than once every second or so, but that's probably due to my low-spec machine.

I've had good experience with a simple time.wait(DELAY - time_elapsed) loop in smoothing out my main loop. I'm not really sure how precise it is, but someone on the list dropped figures like 10% s.d., so that's about 100 ms +/- if I understand correctly. That might be "close enough for funk."

--
Andrew Ulysses Baker
"failrate"

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [pygame] consistent heartbeats
  - From: Kris Schnee

References:
- [pygame] consistent heartbeats
  - From: Miles Van Pelt

Prev by Author: Re: [pygame] Re: [Tutor] An Introduction and a question
Next by Author: Re: [pygame] Natto-Cat
Previous by thread: [pygame] consistent heartbeats
Next by thread: Re: [pygame] consistent heartbeats
Index(es):
- Author
- Thread