[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]
Re: [pygame] monthly FAQ?
- To: pygame-users@xxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [pygame] monthly FAQ?
- From: "René Dudfield" <renesd@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 4 Mar 2008 10:34:08 +1100
- Delivered-to: archiver@xxxxxxxx
- Delivered-to: pygame-users-outgoing@xxxxxxxx
- Delivered-to: pygame-users@xxxxxxxx
- Delivery-date: Mon, 03 Mar 2008 18:34:14 -0500
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=IirEJGdXJ8zmhK8I1IjMCxsJGyLo4+Ot5i008zPqBKE=; b=SSkcBA3SkRGqGrdVUxbvTOAtsblwOM7AyPJSHHeF4Aby4Yy0s+SIgKjoM5l0pF1kbBxaWwY3clXdiLMKQJeXQcqO+1H0bvdYm4iLR4eFplM0RN2y0i1PNgy0heOBPweSyy3G4iCq0XJZZJG1WxxhNeFCVH9FpJUJ38suJMsUxvQ=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=S1CLqPh1BBmDWVK5X7m9dBkQAcGrW8ySwn2sHG0PeaFt7PPELFEEl4ooh4PLshgZcqKSsq8yjkFqMZk/wFrhLjbmzxr0J2rCXtCPtMooPVp7UGRvVdEigMrbKPAakIJ8vnbocAktBj+EQfaM7qYz3CUaiErR9+zU7pfO9Np+1Gw=
- In-reply-to: <45135.127.0.0.1.1204585644.squirrel@xxxxxxxxx>
- References: <45135.127.0.0.1.1204585644.squirrel@xxxxxxxxx>
- Reply-to: pygame-users@xxxxxxxx
- Sender: owner-pygame-users@xxxxxxxx
hi,
I think our general approach has been to try and make the
documentation better until those FAQs disapear.
Feel free to start a FAQ in the wiki :) That'd be cool. Especially
since then documentation writers could look at the FAQ and figure out
which parts of the docs to improve.
I'm not such a fan of trying to regulate how people speak on mailing
lists though.
On Tue, Mar 4, 2008 at 10:07 AM, Dave LeCompte (really)
<dave@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Years ago, USENET groups and mailing lists would periodically post
> Frequently Asked Questions lists to cut down on people repeatedly covering
> old topics.
>
> Such a thing might not be a bad idea for pygame-users, as we've had a lot
> of similar questions come through over and over again. It might also be a
> good place to write down some encouragements of acceptable behavior that
> have more to do with the list specifically and not PyGame (e.g. quoting is
> strongly encouraged, but edit your quotes to make it easy to read).
>
> It might also help to post such a list on the pygame.org website, which
> would help people find the answers to frequently asked questions with
> their choice of search engines.
>
>
> -Dave LeCompte
>