Dan Ross wrote:
well png compression is loss-less but file are often bigger than jpeg if the image has lots of details. Png files can be huge.Yep. That did it. Thanks Ian. And I agree.On Mon, 24 May 2010 13:39:20 -0700, Ian Mallett <geometrian@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:Hi, I saw one comment about it--saying it had to be .jpg, not .png. I don't know if that's true, but if that's the actual case, then I'd like to complain. .png is awesome, and better in almost every way. It should be supported. Ian
In the time, not so far away, png image on internet website where a shame, very long to load. ;-)