Re: Re: [pygame] Pygame CTypes

To: pygame-users@xxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Re: [pygame] Pygame CTypes
From: "Nicholas Dudfield" <ndudfield@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2008 11:13:47 +1100
Delivered-to: archiver@xxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: pygame-users-outgoing@xxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: pygame-users@xxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Sun, 16 Nov 2008 19:13:57 -0500
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; bh=3lYOgvV0TER+tfW4DOlA/fugmbbV39mcmm8aFSI1N14=; b=uXpH8puU9XFIhjVeQ4R9eaBz+Qp0C/+zg7eW39nuLHPKkkmQo9ChLmVk3P3fJIH5oF pYh1HcID+JrTGNifJtblC5201y1uzl8ecJT0ICwt9dUvEBmTs6bNQIH7mlLGD84c+0hN 6GCTcbiVH6jlsFKACWeKqpxsg0NVfPjNbU/tI=
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:references; b=VGSLkn/GK0W5xFwwkKyKlBMW3+HsL8uecn3Qgtv2HMNj72ZRPIQxlkgPQZaNrasO1K BwNnxbdgZgEzu/eSxrdb/TXH+ObcJx6EUY3YLa1HHOGhoZL8ff78W0JhtafzFv1gueP2 IUgmv/9eZvok0i1wIArD7QFpe9Dp337FwBGXk=
In-reply-to: <200811162336.mAGNavCC015223@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <200811162336.mAGNavCC015223@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: pygame-users@xxxxxxxx
Sender: owner-pygame-users@xxxxxxxx

>>> >>> too hard to get working at an acceptable level.

>>> That's not correct. It was a working implementation of pygame.

Acceptable... Tomatoes, Tomahtoes