on Tue, Apr 12, 2005 at 07:57:21PM +0200, Brian Sutherland (jinty@xxxxxx) wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 12, 2005 at 07:41:42PM +0200, Brian Sutherland wrote:
> > On Mon, Apr 11, 2005 at 03:55:13PM +0100, garry saddington wrote:
> > I am quite interested, I have attached my somewhat outdated CV, but I
>
> Sorry for posting this to the list, but I am not used to lists which
> set the Reply-To: header and just pressed 'r' rather than 'L'.
Which is why informed folks these days have responded to widespread
blatent egregious abuse of Reply-To and related by overriding them in
their mailer's configuration.
For mutt, quoting my .muttrc:
set ignore_list_reply_to = yes
# *FUCK* this shit pisses me off...
# Fri Feb 25 18:27:28 PST 2005
set reply_to = ask-no
I swear this crap bites people in the ass all the time.
Peace.
--
Karsten M. Self <kmself@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> http://kmself.home.netcom.com/
What Part of "Gestalt" don't you understand?
You're not a user, nitwit.
- Jeff Waugh, describing GNOME users.
http://zgp.org/pipermail/linux-elitists/2004-January/008588.html
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature