[
Author Prev
][
Author Next
][Thread Prev][
Thread Next
][
Author Index
][
Thread Index
]
Re: [school-discuss] Micro$oft: Weaker and Sneakier?
To
:
schoolforge-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject
: Re: [school-discuss] Micro$oft: Weaker and Sneakier?
From
: David Lloyd <
lloy0076@xxxxxxxxxxx
>
Date
: Wed, 02 Jul 2008 12:21:39 +0930
Delivered-to
:
archiver@xxxxxxxx
Delivered-to
:
schoolforge-discuss-outgoing@xxxxxxxx
Delivered-to
:
schoolforge-discuss@xxxxxxxx
Delivery-date
: Tue, 01 Jul 2008 22:49:15 -0400
In-reply-to
: <
20080626000901.GE30444@xxxxxxxxxxx
>
References
: <
540863.72746.qm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> <
485D0BEF.3050001@xxxxxxxxxxx
> <
20080626000901.GE30444@xxxxxxxxxxx
>
Reply-to
:
schoolforge-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sender
:
owner-schoolforge-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent
: Thunderbird 2.0.0.4 (X11/20070622)
/me ponders
I wonder whether computer suppliers will lower their prices if they no
longer need to pay for an OEM operating system or whether they'll use it
as an opportunity to increase their (probably low) profit margin.
DSL
Follow-Ups
:
Re: [school-discuss] Micro$oft: Weaker and Sneakier?
From:
James P. Kinney III
Prev by Author:
Re: [school-discuss] Sugar Labs / OLPC
Next by Author:
Re: [school-discuss] Micro$oft: Weaker and Sneakier?
Next by thread:
Re: [school-discuss] Micro$oft: Weaker and Sneakier?
Index(es):
Author
Thread