[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]
Re: [school-discuss] SIF versus other initiatives
> A XML message router using a publish and subscribe model to distribute
> data between networked applications combined with a suite of xml
> schemas for describing administrative and educational data structures.
Well, if you say it fast, it doesn't sound like much, but this is going
to be a tremendous amount of work.
Let's say you're going to build a distributed system of small applets to
solve educational problems. Would you build your system on top of a
system of vapourware? (or on top of a complex and continously changing
Since most of our projects are tiny we have very distinct limitations in
terms of time and resources that we can use to write applications.
I just feel that we should husband these resources very carefully.
> If you assume that capability can be deployed and used it will change
> the way you think of application design and your approach to solving
> problems. It will be much easier to add a small application targeted
> to a specific need.
True. However, the application doesn't exist.
> I think one important area for development in education is the
> combining of formative assessment in with students use of
> computer-based visualization environments. To do this properly the
> interactives need access to authentication systems and a repository
> for storing the formative assessments. Separately I need a web
> application to display the results of mining this assessment
> repository. This experimentation and development is much easier if I
> can build from a SIF/ZIS framework.
Again, this doesn't exist.
> If the work we are doing turns out to be valuable it will be much
> easier to deploy into existing school if they are using SIF
> At this point I think the main advantage to an open source ZIS (the
> xml message router) is that it will make it much easier for open
> source developers to experiment with SIF and make more likely the
> design of new applications with this technology in mind.
Again true. However, the "existential reality" is that it doesn't