[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: [school-discuss] Metadot and MIT



ez publisher! With regard to mysql, to distribute it within your organization, such as on several servers, requires a commercial license. Postgresql is Apache licensing. Many CMS or CRM packages can now use postgresql but not mysql. There are several comparison studies on the web which document the differences. In fact, at the last Linuxwolrd, mysql sought the assistance of postgresql in improving. Mysql is better at marketing. My comparison was taken from cmsmatrix.org.
Cameron Miller wrote:

Haven't tried Metadot, mainly because I think mod_perl is a pain. The project does appear to have lots of small and large users, middle school through large U's.

MySql is GPL licensed and freely available for download and use. I find MySql every bit as good as Postgres for most uses, and a lot easier to set up and maintain than Postgres or Oracle.

A lot of the features you cite as not being available in Metadot apparently are, listed both at the cmsmatrix site and the Metadot feature page.
What is your suggestion for a CMS/portal doing all of the things you state Metadot lacks?

- cameron

Michael Dean wrote:

if one wants to compare CMS/portals go to cmsmatrix.org. I have some problems with metadot, which I have looked at in detail for smaller schools. First, it is written in perl, which when it scales is very slow. Second, you need mysql or oracle to run it. Fine for big universities, who usually have Oracle, but if you want an open source solution in your middleware as well as user applications not so fine. Mysql also costs money, and is not a comparable (not as good) database to either Oracle or postgresql. second, it does not provide an audit trail, no content approval, requires use of LDAP for authentication, admin is not notified of problems, does not run under SSL, has no commercial certification or documentation, no online help, does not provide a structure for third party developer add-ins, no drag and drop content, no undo, no advanced caching, no database replication, no content staging, no affiliate tracking, no deployment as a package, no way to trash old content, no web statistics, no web based translation management, no workflow engine, no ftp support (even scp), is not WAI compliant, no webdav support, not xhtml compliant, no cgi support, no interface localization, not metadata support, is not multi-lingual, or wiki aware. no chat, no classifieds. No contact management, no data entry, no database reports, no groupware, no guest book, no bug reporting/help desk, no HTTP proxy, no surveys, no tests/quizzes. The keyword here is NO!

One of schoolforge's affiliates was totally trashed last weekend by a porn marketeer who placed 2500 links to porn sites in the comments section of every artricle about school software. This is why content approval and moderation is so important in your software, especially in grade schools. Also, one would want to audit who does what on your site, because trashing your site with porn in the US is a felony.
Daniel Guermeur wrote:

Hello all,

Just to announce that Metadot Portal Server software has a new university user: MIT.
Metadot is used by numerous schools and university including Berkeley, Pace and many orders for their intranet, extranet or organization websites. Metadot provides content management, collaboration and portal (like My Yahoo) functionality. The key differentiator is the extreme ease of use so that non technical users can manage the content without asking their busy IT person to help.

See live sites at:
http://www.metadot.com/index.pl?id=2528

Daniel
--
Daniel Guermeur - daniel@metadot.com
www.metadot.com - Be Part Of The Open Source Revolution