Re: Core

[Rick Jones <rickya@siservices.net>]

Rick Jones wrote:
> 
> George Bonser wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, 27 Jan 1998, Micah Yoder wrote:
> >
> > > George Bonser wrote:
> >
> > > Well, right...but I was under the impression that the core would be a
> > > set of "layers" - the base core, development, networking, and X.  Makes
> > > sense to me.
> >
> > Look for the c in core.  If it is upper case as in Core, that means the
> > bare minimum Linux Core. If it is lower case like core, we are talking
> > about the core of the SEUL distribution.
> 
> Please, don't start that mess again.  There was too much confusion over
> that.  Omega, put out that it should be "Linux core".  We can shorten
> that to "lcore" but it's just too darned easy to hit, or not hit, shift
> when typing.  Besides we'd be putting that out every week once we start
> taking on numbers of new sub's.
> 
> Can we agree on calling it "lcore or Lcore" if it's the "Linux core"
> we're talking about instead of the SEUL core?

I just thought of this.  Why refer to them seperatly?  The Linux core is
the SEUL core.  We don't stray from the Linux core until we get into
SEUL base.  Base/required to be exact.  So what are you refering to when
you say SEUL core?

-- 
Out here,

Rick Jones
rickya@siservices.net