Re: [Community_studios] Re: [seul-edu] Re: Unified Front...

[Alex <alex@synchcorp.com>]

Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Howdy,

I think Linux is easier to deploy and manage than Windoze. In my
experience (going on 10 years now) with Windoze, the problem isn't
Linux's difficulty in installation, deployment or maintenance. The
biggest problem with Linux breaking into a new market is everyone's
perception of how difficult it is. Sure, Windoze is easy to install
on a new PC. The problem is when it hits a new piece of hardware, or
finds incompatable code in someone else's product, or something else
that is out of the ordinary. Troubleshooting Windoze is where you
run into the problems, which most people who make the buying
decisions never see. They see "even I can install this on my
computer at home." I think we're going to always hit this wall as
long as we only focus on "this needs to be easy to install" or "we
need an Office compatible suite" or "we need a company that can
provide a support contract". We already have all that, the thing we
keep missing is everyone's perception. When some giant corporation
can steal, appropriate and bully their way to an unreliable,
insecure product, and still get people to pay way too much for it,
that's got to be nothing more than a perception issue. My mother had
to call Microsoft tech support for a problem on her boss' computer
and during the call she figured out how to solve the problem before
their tech guy could. Wow. Great support.

We need to come up with a way to change people's perceptions, that's
all. We already have the ease-of-use, beautiful GUIs, security,
reliability, hardware support, technical support and cost
effectiveness.

Any marketing people out there? :)

Alex Heizer
http://www.synchcorp.com/alex
http://www.synchcorp.com/alexheizer


tom poe wrote:

> On Thursday 25 April 2002 11:06, Stephen C. Daukas wrote:
> - - -snip - - -
> > I have to agree with Alan and Michael.  While I think a simple,
> > self-contained educational ISO is a great place to start (and we
still
> > haven't defined that content yet), I believe you must eventually
make "the
> > whole Linux thing" easy to deploy and run to win the hearts and
minds of
> > everyone in education.
> >
> > However, we do need a stake in the ground if we are to make any
> > progress.  I think a simple offering that can be dropped onto an
existing
> > distro is something than can be done without too much heavy
lifting...  It
> > sounds like there is stuff in the pipe (according previous
posts), which
> > needs a little attention, that could be put into an ISO.  This
could be
> > distributed in a similar way to Red Hat's once-upon-a-time Power
Tools CD,
> > and we might get a lot of other contrib if we put the word out.
We might
> > even get a lot of help with initial deployment from those groups
mentioned
> > by Tom that could help get us to the next step.  I would still
hope that a
> > vendor would pick-up on the ISO and run with it...
> >
> > Once we know what we need for education (i.e., once the ISO's
content is
> > defined), we can move on from there!
> >
> > Steve
>
> Hi:  I have set the "try to get informational interviews" thingy
aside [as an
> outsider, my requests, I am sad to report, have gone unanswered
from school
> principals - must have been a bad idea], and am now working with
two fellows
> that understand the tech end, to put a "starting block" demo in
place.  We
> have a server and one, maybe two x-terminals as our starting
point.  We are
> thinking, today, about whether the server will be Debian, or
Slackware.  Any
> consensus out there, yet?  The hesitation I have about the RH
approach, is
> that I have the feeling that their "support" package is
significantly higher
> than we might arrange for, with some other distributions?  In
other words, I
> think there was talk at some point, that the networks would
somehow be tied
> directly to RH "in house".  Much along the lines of an ASP setup.
Anyone
> know, what the situation is at this time?
> Thanks,
> Tom Poe
> Reno, NV
> http://www.studioforrecording.org/
> http://www.ibiblio.org/studioforrecording/
> http://renotahoe.pm.org/
> _______________________________________________
> Community_studios mailing list
> Community_studios@lists.ibiblio.org
> http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/community_studios