[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [seul-edu] Best wm for tiny slow computers?
On Fri, 1 Feb 2002, Ralph M. Deal wrote:
> system to use it more widely. The users will be most happy with a gui
> like the MSwindows they are accustomed to. However, thes are small (16M
> RAM, ca 500M hard disk, no CDROM drives) slow (75MHz is fast in this
> bunch) in which gnome will be sluggish and much to large.
Forget Gnome and KDE on such machines. here goes a simple list of
possibilities and impossibilities:
Impossibilities (don't go for them):
Sawmill/Sawfish: it relies on Lisp interpreting, not a good
idea for slow boxes.
Enlightenment: excessive eye candy that consumes cpu.
KDE: too heavy
Gnome: too heavy
Possibilities:
IceWM: Ice is probably the most Windows-ish lightweight
window manager, if the users are familiar with windows
and not willing to learn a new interface, IceWM will
provide the usual task bar with a "Start" menu.
WindowMaker: The best cost/benefit ratio among all. It is not
straightforward for Windows users (will take them
like a week to get used to it) but provides much
functionality with low CPU/memory usage.
XFCE: mimics the Sun CDE environment. It's not so light
but is probably the closer you can get to the complexity
of Gnome/KDE without paying the full price (cpu cycles,
not dollars)
Blackbox: very minimalist WM yet cool-looking, but you need a set
of helper applications to get key shourtcuts and other
functionalities going (bbkeys, application launchers,
the balckbox page will probably recommend some)
> What, in your experience in similar situations, is the best compromise
> in a window manager to be reasonably fast and small but look familiar to
> students? Right now I'm using xfce which I use myself but it would be
> nice to have icons representing files and have double clicks thereon to
> open the appropriate program with that file.
Sounds like IceWM is what you want.
See
http://www.icewm.org/images/shots/warp3.png
(the task bar can be put on the bottom as Windows has as default)
> Most of the monitors in this batch are labelled with names not in the RH
> LINUX list of recognized monitors so that will be time-consuming. Any
> suggestions there?
My experience with "unlabelled" monitors is that most of them fit in the
"vanilla SVGA that can do interlaced 1024x768 @87Hz" option of
XF86Config.
> PS How do I get onto the schoolforge mailing list?
Go to
http://schoolforge.net/sfdiscuss.php
.........................................................................
Felipe Paulo Guazzi Bergo - Free Software Developer (bergo@seul.org)
GPG/PGP mail welcome - GPG/PGP Key: EF8EE808 (keyserver pgp.mit.edu)
http://www.advogato.org/person/khazad - Brasilia - DF - Brazil - Earth
* In topologic hell, beer comes in Klein's bottles.