That's on the list too. The question I was responding to was Karel, KarelJ, or both.On Fri, 2003-02-07 at 14:56, Doug Loss wrote:Since it appears that all the development effort is going to KarelJ, I'd say that we should just package that.Darryl Palmer wrote:For "Karel The Robot" phase 2 apps, is it just KarelJ that should be
packaged or is it both Karel and KarelJ from
http://sourceforge.net/projects/karel/?
I'm sorry to presumably react much too late, but what about pyKarel?
Seems nice prima facie.
http://pykarel.sourceforge.net/index.php