Re: new eduml dtd

[Daniel Moore <mooreds@whitman.edu>]

On Tue, 5 Jan 1999, Bruno Vernier wrote:
>I just posted a slightly corrected EDUML file with a call to your DTD
>and nsgmls still produces a few errors but it does parse something!
>I think it is just a matter of cleaning up vocabulary differences now

The DTD will continue to track the sample XML document.  I think that
the more 'real world' data sets we have, the better.  Perhaps we
should request submissions of such sets from teachers on this and
other lists?

Also, someone made a reference to an international postal standard.  I
did a bit of web-searching, and couldn't find any references to such a
thing, though common sense would suggest its existence.  

Dan