[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [seul-edu] Need advice
- To: seul-edu@seul.org
- Subject: Re: [seul-edu] Need advice
- From: acidbase@netbank.com.br
- Date: Sat, 3 Mar 2001 14:20:59 -0300
- Delivery-Date: Sat, 03 Mar 2001 11:13:33 -0500
- In-Reply-To: <01022411305200.05761@kay>; from cfiaime@nconnect.net on Sat, Feb 24, 2001 at 11:26:45AM -0600
- Mail-Followup-To: acidbase@netbank.com.br, seul-edu@seul.org
- References: <Pine.LNX.4.10.10102221234450.27339-100000@localhost.localdomain> <01022411305200.05761@kay>
- Reply-To: seul-edu@seul.org
- Sender: owner-seul-edu@seul.org
- User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
Free advice :)
Do you try to use Conectiva Linux?
Conectiva Linux is a very easy to use Linux distribution made in Brazil.
You can see more about in:
The Duke of URL
http://www.thedukeofurl.org/reviews/misc/conectiva6/ (in english)
Linux Plančte (#11 is not yet online) (in french)
http://www.dppresse.com/pl
Linux in Brazil
http://linux.matrix.com.br/distibs_cl6ce.htm (in portuguese)
My Home :) (in english)
http://acidbase.dyndns.org/conectiva.html
Conectiva's Development Home Page
http://distro.conectiva.com
That's all
Osvaldo
PS. Sorry for my bad english.
On Sat, Feb 24, 2001 at 11:26:45AM -0600, jeff williams wrote:
> On Wed, 21 Feb 2001, you wrote:
> > I've heard a lot of negatives about RH 7.0 ... many people who've tried it
> > (including myself) have gone back to 6.2. The usual advice is to wait for
> > 7.1 or 7.2. For practical purposes, 7.0 is not that different to 6.2
> > (especially if you're not connected to the net ... if you are, inetd has
> > become xinetd).
>
> Greetings!
>
> We used RH 7.0 for the winter interem semester Linux administration class. My
> students and I found the configuration tools (basicly Linuxconf) to be
> incomplete. Many times we had to resort the the HOWTOs and vi to get server
> tasks to properly run. We are now working on an information kiosk project and
> have decided to use Slackware 7.1 as the base.
>
> One major drawback of RH 7, the binaries produced by RH 7 won't execute on
> other releases / distributions because of library inconsistencies.
>
> Methinks RH 6.2 or Slackware 7.1 may be the warm setup.
>
> --
> jeff williams - cfiaime@nconnect.net
> jeff.williams@cuw.edu
> jbw9586@ksu.edu
>