[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: X11 non open-source? (a solution?)

To: Erik Walthinsen <omega@omegacs.net>
Subject: Re: X11 non open-source? (a solution?)
From: George Bonser <grep@oriole.sbay.org>
Date: Mon, 6 Apr 1998 23:55:35 -0700 (PDT)
cc: Micah Yoder <lyoder@cyberis.net>, seul-leaders@seul.org
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.3.96.980406233532.2371E-100000@calvin.shorelink.com>
Sender: owner-seul-leaders@seul.org

On Mon, 6 Apr 1998, George Bonser wrote:

> I smell Gates somewhere in this.
> 
> Exactly who owns Open Group?

To answer my own question:  Platinum members are:

Digital Equipment Corporation
Fujitsu Limited
Hewlett-Packard Company
IBM Corporation
NCR Corporation
Novell, Inc.
Siemens Nixdorf Information Systems
Sun Microsystems, Inc

George Bonser 
Just be thankful that Microsoft does not manufacture pharmaceuticals.
http://www.debian.org
Debian/GNU Linux ... the maintainable operating system.

===
SEUL-Leaders list, seul-leaders-request@seul.org
===

Follow-Ups:
- Re: X11 non open-source? (a solution?)
  - From: George Bonser <grep@oriole.sbay.org>

References:
- Re: X11 non open-source? (a solution?)
  - From: George Bonser <grep@oriole.sbay.org>

Prev by Date: Re: X11 non open-source? (a solution?)
Next by Date: Re: X11 non open-source? (a solution?)
Prev by thread: Re: X11 non open-source? (a solution?)
Next by thread: Re: X11 non open-source? (a solution?)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread