[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: SEUL: XDM loop-o-death

To: seul-project@seul.org
Subject: Re: SEUL: XDM loop-o-death
From: The Thought Assassin <assassin@sleepless.south.networx.net.au>
Date: Tue, 17 Feb 1998 18:53:59 +0800 (WST)
In-Reply-To: <XFMail.980217052811.cyberdyn@seul.org>
Sender: owner-seul-project@seul.org
To-Get-Off-This-List: mail majordomo@seul.org, body unsubscribe seul-project

On Tue, 17 Feb 1998, Cyberdyn wrote:
> Ok, folks.  The dreaded loop-o-death has been vanquished from my system for
> good.
> It was easy beans.  I almost hate to devulge it, it was that easy.
in fact he didn't :)
> I don't have a clue why nobody hasn't implemented this before.
OK, I will have to openly display my ignorance now and ask why was this
considered hard in the first place??

> So, what's the next argument against dropping a user into XDM?
I haven't heard any worthwhile arguments yet, but then I suspect I didn't
understand what the problem was with XDM?

-Greg Bastow(Know your faults, Know your friends,
             Be prepared to take revenge.)

References:
- SEUL: XDM loop-o-death
  - From: Cyberdyn <cyberdyn@seul.org>

Prev by Date: SEUL: XDM loop-o-death
Next by Date: Re: SEUL: Stopping dreams
Prev by thread: SEUL: XDM loop-o-death
Next by thread: Re: SEUL: XDM loop-o-death
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread