[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]
[tor-bugs] #21996 [Core Tor/Tor]: Should we treat BUG messages as fatal errors during fuzzing?
#21996: Should we treat BUG messages as fatal errors during fuzzing?
------------------------------+--------------------------------
Reporter: Sebastian | Owner:
Type: defect | Status: new
Priority: Medium | Milestone: Tor: 0.3.1.x-final
Component: Core Tor/Tor | Version:
Severity: Normal | Keywords:
Actual Points: | Parent ID:
Points: | Reviewer:
Sponsor: |
------------------------------+--------------------------------
While wondering why #21966 wasn't caught during consdiff code fuzzing, I
noticed that in the C implementation failing to apply a generated diff is
not a reason to assert, but rather an LD_BUG log message is generated.
Unapplying the 21966 fix and fuzzing promptly leads to the discovery of
that bug. I think it might make sense to ensure any BUG message that gets
triggered fails an assertion if we're currently fuzzing?
--
Ticket URL: <https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/21996>
Tor Bug Tracker & Wiki <https://trac.torproject.org/>
The Tor Project: anonymity online
_______________________________________________
tor-bugs mailing list
tor-bugs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-bugs