[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]
Re: [tor-bugs] #30174 [Core Tor/sbws]: possible SBWS measurement quality regression
#30174: possible SBWS measurement quality regression
---------------------------+-----------------------------------
Reporter: starlight | Owner: (none)
Type: defect | Status: needs_information
Priority: Medium | Milestone: sbws: unspecified
Component: Core Tor/sbws | Version: sbws: 1.1.0
Severity: Normal | Resolution:
Keywords: | Actual Points:
Parent ID: | Points:
Reviewer: | Sponsor:
---------------------------+-----------------------------------
Comment (by starlight):
According to the vote document it's "software_version=1.1.0", what I say
above in the description (which you copy in reply), is the current git
release and you posted about it on tor-relays. This ticket is under SBWS
so what doubt inspires the scanner/version question?
The out-of-whack numbers I observed reverted--SBWS requires a substantial
ramp-up time before quality is achieved. Torflow has an explicit
mechanism to delay publishing until equilibrium is present, suggest that
SBWS employ something similar.
My recommendation is to examine raw votes in comparison to the POC scanner
Matt authored as a QA validation. I still like the idea, even with the
vote quality improvement.
--
Ticket URL: <https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/30174#comment:2>
Tor Bug Tracker & Wiki <https://trac.torproject.org/>
The Tor Project: anonymity online
_______________________________________________
tor-bugs mailing list
tor-bugs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-bugs