[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]
[tor-bugs] #1896 [Metrics]: Analyze number of bytes spent on answering directory requests
#1896: Analyze number of bytes spent on answering directory requests
---------------------+------------------------------------------------------
Reporter: karsten | Owner: karsten
Type: task | Status: new
Priority: normal | Milestone:
Component: Metrics | Version:
Keywords: | Parent:
---------------------+------------------------------------------------------
The new code for counting the number of bytes spent on answering directory
requests is merged into 0.2.2.15-alpha, and since August 25, 2010, at
least 10 % of all relays have upgraded to that version. Time to pretend
these 10 % of relays are a representative subset of all relays/directory
mirrors.
I attached four graphs to this ticket:
- dir-bytes-perc-2010-08-31.png shows the percentage of relays reporting
directory bytes. This percentage crossed the 10 % line on August 25, which
is why the subsequent graphs start on this date.
- dir-bytes-total-2010-08-31.png shows the summed up {read,write}-history
lines of all extra-info descriptors as solid lines and the summed up and
normalized dirreq-{read,write}-history lines as dashed lines. It's obvious
that a directory mirror is writing more dir bytes than it's reading,
because it receives short http-like requests and replies with the much
larger directory objects. What wasn't obvious to me before is that relays
write more bytes in total than they read. This difference could be roughly
the same as the difference between written and read directory bytes.
- dir-bytes-diff-2010-08-31.png again shows written and read directory
bytes, plus the difference between written and read dir bytes (dashed blue
line) and the difference between total written and total read bytes (solid
purple line). If the theory was correct that the difference between total
written and total read bytes can be explained from answering directory
requests, the blue and the purple line would overlap. It could be that we
need more than 20 % of all relays to report directory bytes. Or it could
be there's another explanation for the remaining difference.
- dir-bytes-frac-2010-08-31.png finally gives an early answer to the
original question: Relays spend roughly 0.2 % of read bytes and 3.5 % of
written bytes on answering directory requests.
Mike, is this the kind of answer you expected? What else should we analyze
from the given data?
I'm going to re-run this analysis in two to four weeks from now when more
relays have upgraded to have more solid results.
--
Ticket URL: <https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/1896>
Tor Bug Tracker & Wiki <https://trac.torproject.org/>
The Tor Project: anonymity online
_______________________________________________
tor-bugs mailing list
tor-bugs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-bugs