[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]
Re: [tor-bugs] #6362 [Tor Relay]: Let relays bind and declare IPv6 addresses
#6362: Let relays bind and declare IPv6 addresses
------------------------------+---------------------------------------------
Reporter: ln5 | Owner: ln5
Type: enhancement | Status: needs_review
Priority: normal | Milestone:
Component: Tor Relay | Version:
Keywords: SponsorG20120930 | Parent: #4564
Points: | Actualpoints:
------------------------------+---------------------------------------------
Comment(by ln5):
Replying to [comment:6 nickm]:
> Seems plausible. Was there a reason you said this wasn't ready yet other
than the self-testing issue?
Is it possible that you're mixing up #6362 and #6363 (Make directory
authorities vote on "a" lines in consensus network status
documents). The latter lacks support for microdescriptors.
> Also, is there any risk of unintentionally getting an ipv6 address when
you didn't mean to? If so, this patch is a little risky: it might make a
working node accidentally advertise a non-working IPv6 address, thus
getting the 0.2.4 authorities to mark it as down.
At the moment, no. Advertising an IPv6 address requires not only that
what's given in an ORPort option parses into AF_INET6 but also that it
passed !tor_addr_is_internal() with 'for_listening==0, i.e. is not
"[::]" (see #5146). This might change when we fix #5940 (which needs
design love btw).
A related question is how we should treat "ORPort 4711" on a system
with an IPv6 address. This is unresolved in prop186 -- should the
'AllAddrs' option be on by default?
--
Ticket URL: <https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/6362#comment:7>
Tor Bug Tracker & Wiki <https://trac.torproject.org/>
The Tor Project: anonymity online
_______________________________________________
tor-bugs mailing list
tor-bugs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-bugs