[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]
Re: [tor-bugs] #27338 [Core Tor/sbws]: How long should sbws keep measured and observed bandwidths?
#27338: How long should sbws keep measured and observed bandwidths?
---------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: teor | Owner: (none)
Type: task | Status: new
Priority: Medium | Milestone: sbws 1.0 (MVP must)
Component: Core Tor/sbws | Version:
Severity: Normal | Resolution:
Keywords: | Actual Points:
Parent ID: #27108 | Points:
Reviewer: | Sponsor:
---------------------------+-------------------------------------
Comment (by juga):
Replying to [comment:2 juga]:
> > Oh, and I think we should always use the latest
{Relay,}Bandwidth{Rate,Burst}.
>
> Do you mean descriptors' bandwidth burst [0]?. We have not used it yet
for anything. How should we use them?.
> We have only used descriptors' bandwidth average [1] to cap the
measurements.
Bandwidth in consensus[2] is min(observed bandwidth, bandwidth rate limit,
10MB/s)
I guess bandwidth rate limit here is bandwidth burst, right?
Should the torflow or sbws scaled bandwidth be limited to the the
bandwidth burst?. AFAIK torflow is not doing that.
> [0] https://gitweb.torproject.org/torspec.git/tree/dir-spec.txt#n427
> [1] https://github.com/pastly/simple-bw-
scanner/blob/master/sbws/lib/v3bwfile.py#L314
[2] https://gitweb.torproject.org/torspec.git/tree/dir-spec.txt#n2595
--
Ticket URL: <https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/27338#comment:3>
Tor Bug Tracker & Wiki <https://trac.torproject.org/>
The Tor Project: anonymity online
_______________________________________________
tor-bugs mailing list
tor-bugs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-bugs