[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: [tor-bugs] #572 [Tor]: fallback-consensus file impractical to use

#572: fallback-consensus file impractical to use
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
 Reporter:  arma                                                             |           Type:  enhancement
   Status:  needs_review                                                     |       Priority:  major      
Milestone:  Tor: 0.2.4.x-final                                               |      Component:  Tor        
  Version:  0.2.0.9-alpha                                                    |     Resolution:  None       
 Keywords:  performance bootstrap dirauth-dos-resistance prop206 tor-client  |         Parent:  #2664      
   Points:                                                                   |   Actualpoints:             
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------+

Comment(by nickm):

 I think about 30-50 dirservers is more reasonable than 500.  I think the
 right way to pick them is to look at long-lived high-uptime caches whose
 operators we know and which have had a persistent IP for a very long time.

 For the linear search, I'm happy to move it to a loopup by digestmap if
 need be, but I don't see anywhere that we call it in the critical path.
 If that's so, I'd prefer to wait until we see a profile: I'll bet you an
 imaginary cookie that it doesn't show up in a profile.

-- 
Ticket URL: <https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/572#comment:40>
Tor Bug Tracker & Wiki <https://trac.torproject.org/>
The Tor Project: anonymity online
_______________________________________________
tor-bugs mailing list
tor-bugs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-bugs