[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: [tor-bugs] #7157 [Tor]: "Low circuit success rate %u/%u for guard %s=%s."

#7157: "Low circuit success rate %u/%u for guard %s=%s."
-----------------------------------------+----------------------------------
 Reporter:  arma                         |          Owner:                    
     Type:  enhancement                  |         Status:  needs_revision    
 Priority:  normal                       |      Milestone:  Tor: 0.2.4.x-final
Component:  Tor                          |        Version:                    
 Keywords:  tor-client, MikePerry201212  |         Parent:  #5456             
   Points:                               |   Actualpoints:  19                
-----------------------------------------+----------------------------------

Comment(by mikeperry):

 Ok, I pushed the changes for review 2. I'll also write up the three major
 changes from the proposal to tor-dev (the two you mentioned + #7691).

 I did not do anything with timestamp_dirty yet. I'm pretty sure we want to
 keep at least the hidserv timestamp_dirty additions.. Do you just want me
 to move the timestamp_dirty change to the cannibalization code? It does
 appear like that might make us decide against re-cannibalizing it, and may
 impact our use of cannibalized circuits under predictive building
 conditions + new identity.. hrmm...

 If you want me to switch to another path_state_t flag, I can do that, but
 it's a bit more changes+refactoring.

-- 
Ticket URL: <https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/7157#comment:25>
Tor Bug Tracker & Wiki <https://trac.torproject.org/>
The Tor Project: anonymity online
_______________________________________________
tor-bugs mailing list
tor-bugs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-bugs