[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]
Re: [tor-bugs] #20923 [Internal Services/Service - lists]: Please create tor-employees mailing list
#20923: Please create tor-employees mailing list
-----------------------------------------------+---------------------
Reporter: ewyatt | Owner: qbi
Type: defect | Status: new
Priority: Medium | Milestone:
Component: Internal Services/Service - lists | Version:
Severity: Normal | Resolution:
Keywords: | Actual Points:
Parent ID: | Points:
Reviewer: | Sponsor:
-----------------------------------------------+---------------------
Comment (by lunar):
When we [[wiki:org/meetings/2015SummerDevMeeting/MembershipProcess|drafted
the first ideas of a formal membership]] a bit more than a year ago, I
advocated for such a list.
Very minor point: if contractors are going to be on this list, I don't
think it's wise to call it “tor-employees”. It could maybe be used against
Tor to say that contractors are disguised employees.
The main rationale is: without such a list, you make it automatic that
every contractors or employees automatically become members of the
project.
But what I wanted was: it should become a member of the Tor community
because you get hired or contracted by Tor the company. Because they work
on different time scales, it seems to make more sense to make them
different processes. If announcements regarding employees and contractors
use the communication channels that are dedicated to project members (who
have been through a community-run membership process), you require
contractors or employees to be on these communication channels. That would
make them exempt of the community process (bad in my opinion) or have
special temporary status (bad in my opnion).
Meanwhile, I need to say that with the current trend where, as a
volunteer, I have very little idea on what the company is doing, this
feels quite worrying. Almost every week there's a new email which makes me
think “oh, I didn't even knew we needed to make such a decision” or “oh, I
didn't even knew we had an open position”.
So I guess I still support a separate list, but without a company that
takes more input from the community, or a way for the community to have
better control over the company, this is likely going to reinforce the
exclusion of members of the community who are not contractors or
employees.
--
Ticket URL: <https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/20923#comment:18>
Tor Bug Tracker & Wiki <https://trac.torproject.org/>
The Tor Project: anonymity online
_______________________________________________
tor-bugs mailing list
tor-bugs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-bugs