[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]
Re: [tor-bugs] #32500 [Core Tor/Tor]: consider clang -std=gnu99 in Travis for better C99 portability
#32500: consider clang -std=gnu99 in Travis for better C99 portability
-------------------------------------------------+-------------------------
Reporter: catalyst | Owner: teor
Type: enhancement | Status:
| merge_ready
Priority: Medium | Milestone: Tor:
| 0.4.3.x-final
Component: Core Tor/Tor | Version:
Severity: Normal | Resolution:
Keywords: portability, tor-ci, 029-backport, | Actual Points: 0.5
035-backport, 040-backport, 041-backport, |
042-backport |
Parent ID: | Points: 0.1
Reviewer: catalyst | Sponsor:
| Sponsor31-can
-------------------------------------------------+-------------------------
Comment (by teor):
Replying to [comment:11 catalyst]:
> Further investigation reveals that `check-cocci` probably hasn't ever
worked on Trusty because of an older version of coccinelle that has a
harder time parsing our files.
`make check-cocci` is quite new, we upgraded to bionic so we could have a
new enough version of coccinelle:
https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/31919#comment:3
I did some extra tests, the required coccinelle version is some version in
this range:
* > 1.0.0-rc21
* <= 1.0.4
I couldn't find any versions lower than 1.0.4 in debian, ubuntu, or macOS
homebrew, so I suggest we require 1.0.4.
Replying to [comment:16 catalyst]:
> I do think we want to make a comment explaining that
`SKIP_MAKE_CHECK="yes"` is required on Trusty at the moment because its
coccinelle is too old to parse our C files. Would you rather to it as part
of this ticket, or as a new ticket?
Replying to [comment:17 nickm]:
> If we do it this way, can we please have another ticket to make Trusty
skip less? Maybe we should have a "SKIP_COCCI" that it can use instead,
and have our makefile acknowledge it.
We only have one Trusty CI job right now, which runs chutney without `make
check`. We'd have the chutney job on bionic, but that's blocked on #32240.
But you're right, our `make check` should run without failing, even if
people have a really old coccinelle.
I suggest we require coccinelle version 1.0.4 in `check_cocci_parse.sh`.
That way, our changes work in the Makefile and the git hooks. And we can
put the relevant comment/notice there.
We should also check what happens if we install coccinelle on Windows.
I opened #32663 for this fix.
--
Ticket URL: <https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/32500#comment:18>
Tor Bug Tracker & Wiki <https://trac.torproject.org/>
The Tor Project: anonymity online
_______________________________________________
tor-bugs mailing list
tor-bugs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-bugs