[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: [tor-bugs] #5038 [Obfsproxy]: Measure obfsproxy/obfs2 perfromance (was: how many clients can a given obfsproxy bridge handle?)

#5038: Measure obfsproxy/obfs2 perfromance
-----------------------+----------------------------------------------------
 Reporter:  arma       |          Owner:  asn
     Type:  task       |         Status:  new
 Priority:  normal     |      Milestone:     
Component:  Obfsproxy  |        Version:     
 Keywords:             |         Parent:     
   Points:             |   Actualpoints:     
-----------------------+----------------------------------------------------

Comment(by asn):

 Replying to [ticket:5038 arma]:
 > Once we get the client-side of #4927 (tbb + obfs) building, I wonder if
 we should seed it with a fast stable obfs2 bridge. That way you can use
 your own obfs2 bridge, but you can also try out obfs2 without needing to
 find your own.
 >
 > Clearly, if the bundle becomes way popular, that bridge will get
 hammered in terms of bandwidth.
 >
 > But will obfsproxy hold up until that point, on the bridge side? Or will
 it fall over earlier? Any guesses, or better, some way to find out for
 reals?

 I doubt I can accurately answer the first two questions. As I see it,
 obfsproxy (with obfs2, at least) '''should''' hold more load than tor,
 since its architecture and functionality is much more lightweight. Let's
 do #5059 and figure if this is true.

-- 
Ticket URL: <https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/5038#comment:1>
Tor Bug Tracker & Wiki <https://trac.torproject.org/>
The Tor Project: anonymity online
_______________________________________________
tor-bugs mailing list
tor-bugs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-bugs