[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: [tor-bugs] #7153 [Pluggable transport]: Don't require pluggable transport proxies to be SOCKS proxies

#7153: Don't require pluggable transport proxies to be SOCKS proxies
---------------------------------+------------------------------------------
 Reporter:  karsten              |          Owner:  asn
     Type:  project              |         Status:  new
 Priority:  normal               |      Milestone:     
Component:  Pluggable transport  |        Version:     
 Keywords:  SponsorF20130228     |         Parent:     
   Points:                       |   Actualpoints:     
---------------------------------+------------------------------------------

Comment(by arma):

 Replying to [comment:9 nickm]:
 > I'm not getting a great sense here what interface you actually want,
 beyond "Not the current one!"  Is there a flashproxy/stegotorus document
 that explains your preferred solution here?  (Please forgive me if it's
 described above and I'm just not seeing it.)

 I think you're looking at this from the opposite direction: they hope we
 will think up a protocol that better (less hackily) supports what they're
 trying to wrestle our current protocol into doing. This isn't a "please
 build the following alternate interface" ticket. This ticket is a step
 before that.

-- 
Ticket URL: <https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/7153#comment:12>
Tor Bug Tracker & Wiki <https://trac.torproject.org/>
The Tor Project: anonymity online
_______________________________________________
tor-bugs mailing list
tor-bugs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-bugs