Re: [tor-bugs] #9321 [Tor]: Load balance right when we have higher guard rotation periods

["Tor Bug Tracker & Wiki" <blackhole@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

#9321: Load balance right when we have higher guard rotation periods
-------------------------+-------------------------------------------------
     Reporter:  arma     |      Owner:
         Type:  project  |     Status:  needs_review
     Priority:  major    |  Milestone:  Tor: 0.2.6.x-final
    Component:  Tor      |    Version:
   Resolution:           |   Keywords:  needs-proposal, tor-auth, tor-
Actual Points:           |  client, 026-triaged-1, unfrozen, nickm-review
       Points:           |  Parent ID:  #11480
-------------------------+-------------------------------------------------

Comment (by asn):

 Replying to [comment:45 teor]:
 > Apologies for my absence - life has been very chaotic for a few weeks.
 >
 > Reviewing asn/bug9321_rebase:
 > Merging with b101f4e98ce811aee729c31f62ec5dd1cfe44e85 from tor git
 > {{{
 > CONFLICT (content): Merge conflict in src/or/dirvote.h
 > }}}
 >
 > Resolved conflict by including both #defines:
 > {{{#!c
 > <<<<<<< HEAD
 > /** Lowest consensus method where we include "package" lines*/
 > #define MIN_METHOD_FOR_PACKAGE_LINES 19
 > =======
 > /** Lowest consensus method where authorities may include
 >  * GuardFraction information in microdescriptors. */
 > #define MIN_METHOD_FOR_GUARDFRACTION 19
 > >>>>>>> asn/bug9321_rebase
 > }}}
 >
 > Is this the right approach?
 > (Running tests now...

 Oh more conflicts...

 The correct approach here I think is to bump the
 `MIN_METHOD_FOR_GUARDFRACTION` to `20`, so that they don't conflict.

--
Ticket URL: <https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/9321#comment:46>
Tor Bug Tracker & Wiki <https://trac.torproject.org/>
The Tor Project: anonymity online
_______________________________________________
tor-bugs mailing list
tor-bugs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-bugs