Re: [tor-bugs] #18037 [Tor]: Should the user be allowed to specify FQDNs for HS TARGETs?

["Tor Bug Tracker & Wiki" <blackhole@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

#18037: Should the user be allowed to specify FQDNs for HS TARGETs?
------------------------+----------------------------------
 Reporter:  yawning     |          Owner:
     Type:  defect      |         Status:  new
 Priority:  Low         |      Milestone:  Tor: 0.2.???
Component:  Tor         |        Version:  Tor: unspecified
 Severity:  Minor       |     Resolution:
 Keywords:  tor-hs dns  |  Actual Points:
Parent ID:              |         Points:
  Sponsor:              |
------------------------+----------------------------------

Comment (by alecmuffett):

 Hi Roger - Yeah, plus I am being dumb. I just realised I meant
 *BindAddress/ListenAddress* not *HiddenServicePort* per the Apache config
 thing. I blame too much coding.

 That said, there might be an argument from consistency for:

 ListenAddress interface:eth0
 HiddenServicePort: interface:eth0 80

 ...using such a mechanism to keep all traffic identifiable within one
 (virtual?) network interface?

--
Ticket URL: <https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/18037#comment:10>
Tor Bug Tracker & Wiki <https://trac.torproject.org/>
The Tor Project: anonymity online
_______________________________________________
tor-bugs mailing list
tor-bugs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-bugs