[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]
Re: [tor-bugs] #18361 [Tor Browser]: Issues with corporate censorship and mass surveillance
#18361: Issues with corporate censorship and mass surveillance
------------------------------------------+--------------------------
Reporter: ioerror | Owner: tbb-team
Type: enhancement | Status: new
Priority: High | Milestone:
Component: Tor Browser | Version:
Severity: Critical | Resolution:
Keywords: security, privacy, anonymity | Actual Points:
Parent ID: | Points:
Sponsor: |
------------------------------------------+--------------------------
Comment (by lunar):
Replying to [comment:117 jgrahamc]:
> Replying to [comment:109 cypherpunks]:
> > jgrahamc: Could you confirm what/whether you changed?
>
> We didn't make code changes around this, but looking at the trend in
abuse coming from Tor exit nodes there has been a steady increase in the
percentage of exits through which we see abuse since December.
Could you run similar comparisons with Internet access providers using
Carrier-grade NAT? Could you tell use what qualifies as abuse?
If abuse is âattackingâ your honeypots then your system is simply going to
fail hard in the next year. Even older Internet access providers are
[http://www.numerama.com/tech/145703-free-peut-attribuer-la-meme-adresse-
ip-a-plusieurs-abonnes.html being forced] to do Carrier-grade NAT as IPv4
are now a scarce resource. You can't punish millions of users as soon as
one bad actor hits your honeypots.
Tor is just being slightly ahead of what the IPv4 Internet is going to
look like pretty soon.
--
Ticket URL: <https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/18361#comment:121>
Tor Bug Tracker & Wiki <https://trac.torproject.org/>
The Tor Project: anonymity online
_______________________________________________
tor-bugs mailing list
tor-bugs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-bugs