[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]
Re: [tor-bugs] #17248 [Applications/Tor Browser]: Investigate new WebExtensions API requirements for our extensions
#17248: Investigate new WebExtensions API requirements for our extensions
--------------------------------------+--------------------------
Reporter: gk | Owner: tbb-team
Type: task | Status: closed
Priority: High | Milestone:
Component: Applications/Tor Browser | Version:
Severity: Normal | Resolution: fixed
Keywords: TorBrowserTeam201512 | Actual Points:
Parent ID: | Points:
Reviewer: | Sponsor:
--------------------------------------+--------------------------
Comment (by tom):
Replying to [comment:17 mcs]:
> Replying to [comment:16 tom]:
> > So while I agree with Yawning to some respects for future endeavors
and improvements, after talking with some Add-On/WebExtension folks I
think the path forward for Tor Launcher is simple - we don't _have_ to do
anything. We don't _have_ to port these to WebExtensions, as 'legacy' add-
ons will live on as Privileged Add-Ons. Mozilla will require special
signatures for Privileged Add-Ons, but the capability to use them will
live on - possibly indefinitely but certainly for 59.
>
> Thanks for hunting down that info. Is there anything available publicly
about "Privileged Add-ons", e.g., documentation or a Bugzilla bug?
Probably not.
> Does Mozilla plan to use such add-ons for their own purposes?
Yes, that's the plan. Things like Test Pilot will be privileged add-ons,
and I'm certain there will be others.
--
Ticket URL: <https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/17248#comment:18>
Tor Bug Tracker & Wiki <https://trac.torproject.org/>
The Tor Project: anonymity online
_______________________________________________
tor-bugs mailing list
tor-bugs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-bugs