[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: [tor-bugs] #28655 [Obfuscation/BridgeDB]: If a bridge supports obfs4, don't give out its other flavors

#28655: If a bridge supports obfs4, don't give out its other flavors
----------------------------------+---------------------------
 Reporter:  arma                  |          Owner:  dgoulet
     Type:  defect                |         Status:  assigned
 Priority:  High                  |      Milestone:
Component:  Obfuscation/BridgeDB  |        Version:
 Severity:  Normal                |     Resolution:
 Keywords:  bridgedb              |  Actual Points:
Parent ID:                        |         Points:  2
 Reviewer:                        |        Sponsor:  Sponsor19
----------------------------------+---------------------------

Comment (by arma):

 Replying to [comment:6 dcf]:
 > Linking #7349, which is like this ticket, but more comprehensive

 I would say differently comprehensive, but not a superset of this one.

 In this ticket, I want us to e.g. stop giving out the obfs3 port when
 there is an obfs4 port.

 More broadly, if a bridge supports both active-probing-resistant and
 active-probing-vulnerable options, then we should give out only the
 active-probing-resistant ones.

--
Ticket URL: <https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/28655#comment:7>
Tor Bug Tracker & Wiki <https://trac.torproject.org/>
The Tor Project: anonymity online

_______________________________________________
tor-bugs mailing list
tor-bugs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-bugs