[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]
Re: [tor-bugs] #13221 [Core Tor/Tor]: Misleading error messages about bind_ipv4_only and bind_ipv6_only?
#13221: Misleading error messages about bind_ipv4_only and bind_ipv6_only?
-------------------------------------------------+-------------------------
Reporter: arma | Owner: (none)
Type: defect | Status:
| needs_revision
Priority: Low | Milestone: Tor:
| 0.4.1.x-final
Component: Core Tor/Tor | Version: Tor:
| 0.2.3.9-alpha
Severity: Normal | Resolution:
Keywords: 041-proposed, tor-client, easy, | Actual Points: .1
logging, message, usability, 029-backport- |
maybe, 034-backport-maybe, 035-backport, |
040-backport |
Parent ID: | Points: .1
Reviewer: teor | Sponsor:
-------------------------------------------------+-------------------------
Changes (by teor):
* status: needs_review => needs_revision
* keywords: 041-proposed, tor-client, easy, logging, message, usability =>
041-proposed, tor-client, easy, logging, message, usability, 029
-backport-maybe, 034-backport-maybe, 035-backport, 040-backport
* milestone: Tor: unspecified => Tor: 0.4.1.x-final
* version: => Tor: 0.2.3.9-alpha
* actualpoints: => .1
Comment:
Hi,
Thanks for this pull request.
Sorry it's taken a while for us to get to it: many of us were at a
hackfest in January, then on leave.
Replying to [comment:8 kjak]:
> Here is a PR to fix this: https://github.com/torproject/tor/pull/669
>
> I didn't change the overall wording of the error message because
personally I think it's fine (aside from the IP version mixup). I think
it's short and clear and means "You told me to only bind to an IPv4
address but I couldn't interpret the address as IPv4."
>
> I took the liberty of also cleaning up the error-checking logic to make
it a little more precise about what is being checked. I hope that's OK.
It looks good to me.
> (I'm also adding the keyword 041-proposed, which my other recent tickets
got. Is it OK for me to do that or is adding a keyword like that reserved
for core team members?)
Yes, that's fine. We're still experimenting with our proposed tickets
process.
Review:
There was a failure in one of the jobs due to our stochastic random tests.
I re-ran the job and it was fine.
This patch fixes an error that's been around since 2011.
It's confusing to relay operators, so it is a backport candidate.
Would you mind rebasing your patch on our maint-0.2.9 branch?
If you can't, just let us know, and we'll do it eventually.
--
Ticket URL: <https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/13221#comment:10>
Tor Bug Tracker & Wiki <https://trac.torproject.org/>
The Tor Project: anonymity online
_______________________________________________
tor-bugs mailing list
tor-bugs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-bugs