[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]
Re: [tor-bugs] #33076 [Metrics/Analysis]: Graph onionperf and consensus information from Rob's experiments
#33076: Graph onionperf and consensus information from Rob's experiments
-------------------------------------------------+-------------------------
Reporter: mikeperry | Owner:
| metrics-team
Type: task | Status:
| needs_review
Priority: Medium | Milestone:
Component: Metrics/Analysis | Version:
Severity: Normal | Resolution:
Keywords: metrics-team-roadmap-2020Q1, sbws- | Actual Points:
roadmap |
Parent ID: #33121 | Points:
Reviewer: | Sponsor:
-------------------------------------------------+-------------------------
Changes (by karsten):
* status: needs_revision => needs_review
Comment:
Replying to [comment:13 mikeperry]:
> Hrmm. The consensus graphs now all look good, but the votes are a real
mystery. It almost looks like only 25% of relays are being measured in
these votes?
>
> Do 75% of relays in the network really have a 1.0 value for 1000 *
measured / min_rate_observed (ie measured = min_rate_observed/1000)?
>
> Or are the votes scales differently, and we're just clipping because
upper end of the range is much greater than 1.0 for votes?
The issue was that I used the `Bandwidth` value from both consensuses and
votes, where I should have used the `Measured` value from votes. That also
explains why the graphs were the same for all authorities. Fixed
[https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/attachment/ticket/33076/cdf-
relay-utilization-and-stream-capacity-2020-02-04.pdf here].
--
Ticket URL: <https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/33076#comment:16>
Tor Bug Tracker & Wiki <https://trac.torproject.org/>
The Tor Project: anonymity online
_______________________________________________
tor-bugs mailing list
tor-bugs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-bugs