[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]
Re: [tor-bugs] #7932 [Stem]: Clarify that pre-method 9 footers contains signatures
#7932: Clarify that pre-method 9 footers contains signatures
------------------------+---------------------------------------------------
Reporter: karsten | Owner: atagar
Type: defect | Status: reopened
Priority: trivial | Milestone:
Component: Stem | Version:
Resolution: | Keywords:
Parent: | Points:
Actualpoints: |
------------------------+---------------------------------------------------
Changes (by karsten):
* status: closed => reopened
* resolution: fixed =>
* component: Tor => Stem
Comment:
Re-opening this issue, but for the Stem side. I found that ides published
52 votes in January 2010 supporting consensus method 9 but without
"directory-footer" line. I'm not sure what to do there. On the one hand
it's no big harm for Stem to ignore them as malformed, but on the other
hand it might be useful for some analyses to parse them anyway. Here's an
[https://people.torproject.org/~karsten/volatile/2010-01-28-00-00-00-vote-
27B6B5996C426270A5C95488AA5BCEB6BCC86956-7B8C92F717C508C203EBD626B5969AEB7D211BDE.gz
example], and here's Stem's output: "skipped
/home/karsten/tasks/task-7828/stem/data/votes-2010-01/28/2010-01-28-00-00-00
-vote-
27B6B5996C426270A5C95488AA5BCEB6BCC86956-7B8C92F717C508C203EBD626B5969AEB7D211BDE
due to 'Network status document's footer should start with a 'directory-
footer' line in consensus-method 9 or later' (type: <class
'stem.descriptor.reader.ParsingFailure'>)". I don't feel strongly here.
Up to you, atagar.
--
Ticket URL: <https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/7932#comment:6>
Tor Bug Tracker & Wiki <https://trac.torproject.org/>
The Tor Project: anonymity online
_______________________________________________
tor-bugs mailing list
tor-bugs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-bugs