[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]
Re: [tor-bugs] #24831 [Metrics/Onionoo]: Consider providing more/less fine grained data for Realy Search graphs
#24831: Consider providing more/less fine grained data for Realy Search graphs
-----------------------------+------------------------------
Reporter: irl | Owner: metrics-team
Type: enhancement | Status: new
Priority: Medium | Milestone:
Component: Metrics/Onionoo | Version:
Severity: Normal | Resolution:
Keywords: | Actual Points:
Parent ID: #24155 | Points:
Reviewer: | Sponsor:
-----------------------------+------------------------------
Comment (by karsten):
There are two reasons why Onionoo would not provide data for a given graph
(let's take 3 months as example):
1. Data is not available on the granularity that is typically plotted for
the desired time frame, but only on a higher granularity. This is
currently biting us with relays switching from 4 to 24 hours granularity
for bandwidth data. Onionoo does not include this data, because it would
be exactly the same as the graph data for longer time periods. Clients can
check whether there is graph data available for the next longer periods.
In the example, check whether there's a 1 year or 5 years data object and
just plot the last 3 months.
2. Data is available on the right granularity, but only for part of the
graph interval that is already contained in a graph with shorter time
period. In the example, if a relay or bridge is around for less than 1
month, it wouldn't have a 3 months data set, but clients could fall back
to using the 1 month or 1 week or 3 days data set. Note that Onionoo makes
sure that at least one graph is available in such a case.
Would it be difficult to put an ordered list of graph intervals into the
client code, and whenever the requested graph cannot be found, first
search towards longer graph periods and then towards shorter graph
periods? Adding all this redundant data feels like a kludge. We could even
document the approach taken by Relay Search in the Onionoo protocol
specification as recommendation for other clients, if that would help.
--
Ticket URL: <https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/24831#comment:2>
Tor Bug Tracker & Wiki <https://trac.torproject.org/>
The Tor Project: anonymity online
_______________________________________________
tor-bugs mailing list
tor-bugs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-bugs