[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]
Re: [tor-bugs] #24898 [Core Tor/Tor]: We have two conflicting notions of channel_is_client()
#24898: We have two conflicting notions of channel_is_client()
-------------------------------------------------+-------------------------
Reporter: arma | Owner: (none)
Type: defect | Status:
| merge_ready
Priority: Medium | Milestone: Tor:
| 0.3.3.x-final
Component: Core Tor/Tor | Version: Tor:
| 0.3.1.1-alpha
Severity: Normal | Resolution:
Keywords: tor-relay, 032-backport, | Actual Points:
031-backport, 030-backport-maybe-with-21406, |
029-backport-maybe-with-21406 |
Parent ID: | Points: 0.5
Reviewer: teor | Sponsor:
-------------------------------------------------+-------------------------
Changes (by teor):
* keywords: =>
tor-relay, 032-backport, 031-backport, 030-backport-maybe-with-21406,
029-backport-maybe-with-21406
* reviewer: => teor
* points: => 0.5
* status: new => merge_ready
* version: => Tor: 0.3.1.1-alpha
Comment:
This works fine for me in the latest chutney, that comment it outdated.
But please don't remove these lines, they are used by rep_hist:
{{{
if (connection_or_digest_is_known_relay(chan->identity_digest)) {
rep_hist_note_circuit_handshake_requested(create_cell->handshake_type);
}}}
I restored this code in my branch bug24898 on
https://github.com/teor2345/tor.git
Now we just have to decide how far to backport it.
If we want it to go to 0.3.0 or 0.2.9, we need to backport #21406 as well.
--
Ticket URL: <https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/24898#comment:4>
Tor Bug Tracker & Wiki <https://trac.torproject.org/>
The Tor Project: anonymity online
_______________________________________________
tor-bugs mailing list
tor-bugs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-bugs