[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]
Re: [tor-bugs] #13837 [Core Tor/Tor]: Mitigate guard discovery by pinning middle node
#13837: Mitigate guard discovery by pinning middle node
-------------------------------------------------+-------------------------
Reporter: asn | Owner:
| mikeperry
Type: defect | Status:
| merge_ready
Priority: Medium | Milestone: Tor:
| 0.3.3.x-final
Component: Core Tor/Tor | Version:
Severity: Normal | Resolution:
Keywords: tor-hs, tor-guard, guard-discovery- | Actual Points:
prop247-controller, review-group-30 |
Parent ID: #9001 | Points:
Reviewer: asn | Sponsor:
| SponsorV-can
-------------------------------------------------+-------------------------
Comment (by arma):
For commit 6b14e46d:
s/canibalization/cannibalization/ in the commit message
I think I mentioned this in an oniongit comment too, but: in the user- and
outward-facing text, we should say onion rather than hidden. We've been
saying onion even in the code guts too lately, but that's less critical.
I agree with Nick's point that in the man page, we should be clear about
what is a hidden service circuit, and we should also give the user some
guidance about why/how/whether to set these things -- if we don't, we run
the risk of strange cargo cult instruction documents starting to float
around, with people insisting that "HSLayer2Guards {ru}" is the only way
to be safe.
--
Ticket URL: <https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/13837#comment:37>
Tor Bug Tracker & Wiki <https://trac.torproject.org/>
The Tor Project: anonymity online
_______________________________________________
tor-bugs mailing list
tor-bugs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-bugs