[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]
Re: [tor-bugs] #23101 [Core Tor/Tor]: Predict and build specific HS purpose circuits (rather than GENERAL)
#23101: Predict and build specific HS purpose circuits (rather than GENERAL)
-------------------------------------------------+-------------------------
Reporter: mikeperry | Owner:
| mikeperry
Type: enhancement | Status:
| merge_ready
Priority: Medium | Milestone: Tor:
| 0.3.3.x-final
Component: Core Tor/Tor | Version:
Severity: Normal | Resolution:
Keywords: tor-hs, tor-guard, guard-discovery- | Actual Points:
prop247-controller, review-group-27, review- |
group-30 |
Parent ID: #13837 | Points:
Reviewer: asn | Sponsor:
-------------------------------------------------+-------------------------
Comment (by mikeperry):
Replying to [comment:29 arma]:
> Replying to [comment:26 teor]:
> > But maybe it is better to always do vanguards for internal circuits.
Do we know if the onion service attacks apply to other circuits?
>
> Another fun example is testing circuits. If you've set some Vanguards,
that means you're primarily concerned with onion service (or onion client)
performance. Does that mean your internal testing circuits should be using
your Vanguards too? Seems like there's a good argument for yes.
Which testing are you talking about here, and how does that impact
performance? Do you mean CIRCUIT_PURPOSE_TESTING, or the CBT stuff? The
CBT aspects of this were handled in #23100. The CIRCUIT_PURPOSE_TESTING is
just router reachability, right?
--
Ticket URL: <https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/23101#comment:31>
Tor Bug Tracker & Wiki <https://trac.torproject.org/>
The Tor Project: anonymity online
_______________________________________________
tor-bugs mailing list
tor-bugs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-bugs