[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]
Re: [tor-bugs] #27881 [Applications/Tor Browser]: NoScript initial configuration bug?
#27881: NoScript initial configuration bug?
--------------------------------------+---------------------------
Reporter: simplestuf | Owner: (none)
Type: defect | Status: closed
Priority: Medium | Milestone:
Component: Applications/Tor Browser | Version:
Severity: Normal | Resolution: not a bug
Keywords: | Actual Points:
Parent ID: | Points:
Reviewer: | Sponsor:
--------------------------------------+---------------------------
Comment (by simple):
> > There is no 'safer', 'safest' or 'standard' security modes that I can
see within the noscript settings, or within Tor Browser Preferences under
'General' or 'Privacy and Security'. If your 'standard' security mode does
exist somewhere, it does not correspond with noscript's default values as
obtained by pressing the 'reset' button in noscript preferences.
>
> You can find the security slider behind the onion toolbar item ->
Security Settings... We are currently in the process of redesigning that
part to make it both available on the toolbar and the Firefox preferences,
see #25658.
>
> And, yes, the intention is not to emulate or use NoScript's default
settings.
>
Thanks for the info.
> > Also, this is a change that took place under a fairly recent Tor
Browser update: Tor Browser didn't previously start in this insecure
noscript initial state.
>
> It always started in a non-default mode, e.g. with scripts enabled etc.
The particular way of the initial state might have changed with the
NoScript WebExtensions version but, as I said, that's not relevant for us
as we need NoScript mainly for managaing our "safer" and "safest" modes.
Previously I could trust Tor Browser to have noscript active from the
outset, and I think this would be everyone's expectation. Putting the
browser in an insecure default state where noscript misleadingly does
absolutely nothing is a bad decision. If anyone was using the browser to
do anything that actually required some degree of privacy or security, the
update discussed above would have seriously compromised them.
--
Ticket URL: <https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/27881#comment:8>
Tor Bug Tracker & Wiki <https://trac.torproject.org/>
The Tor Project: anonymity online
_______________________________________________
tor-bugs mailing list
tor-bugs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-bugs