[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]
Re: [tor-bugs] #28615 [Metrics/Library]: Additional @type annotation
#28615: Additional @type annotation
-----------------------------+------------------------------
Reporter: atagar | Owner: metrics-team
Type: enhancement | Status: new
Priority: Medium | Milestone:
Component: Metrics/Library | Version:
Severity: Normal | Resolution:
Keywords: | Actual Points:
Parent ID: | Points:
Reviewer: | Sponsor:
-----------------------------+------------------------------
Comment (by atagar):
> The missing "w" line was an example.
[https://gitweb.torproject.org/torspec.git/tree/dir-spec.txt#n2376 'w'
lines are not mandatory], so omitting them does not malform router status
entries (unlike the digest, which arguably does).
Lacking those lines sounds like a weird control protocol quirk which
should be noted in its spec, but is unimportant to the annotation.
> We could look at this function at our hackfest next week. It will need a
refactor before we make any changes. I'll put it on our list.
Thanks!
> 5/6 bandwidth authorities are still using version 1.0 of the bandwidth
file format, because they run torflow.
Gotcha. I'll leave it up to Karsten how we want to present it on the
metrics site. Adding the '@type bandwidth-file' annotation is the
important bit to me. I'll leave it up to others if we want CollecTor to
describe the differences between versions 1.0, 1.1, and 1.2.
--
Ticket URL: <https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/28615#comment:16>
Tor Bug Tracker & Wiki <https://trac.torproject.org/>
The Tor Project: anonymity online
_______________________________________________
tor-bugs mailing list
tor-bugs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-bugs