[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]
Re: [tor-bugs] #32900 [Circumvention/BridgeDB]: Reimplement and generalise BridgeDB?
#32900: Reimplement and generalise BridgeDB?
------------------------------------+------------------------
Reporter: phw | Owner: (none)
Type: project | Status: new
Priority: Medium | Milestone:
Component: Circumvention/BridgeDB | Version:
Severity: Major | Resolution:
Keywords: | Actual Points:
Parent ID: | Points: 20
Reviewer: | Sponsor:
------------------------------------+------------------------
Comment (by phw):
Replying to [comment:1 atagar]:
> Hi phw. The part above concerning Stem/zoossh seems to imply that this
ticket is really about rewriting BridgeDB in Go? If so that's fine, but it
seems an odd response to #30946.
[[br]]
Yes, if I would rewrite it, I would do it in Go – but not only because of
#30946. That was just the tipping point that led to me filing this ticket.
[[br]]
> I haven't run BrideDB, but I'm very experienced with python3 porting. If
you're stuck on #30946 maybe I can help?
[[br]]
I would greatly appreciate your help with this. The majority of issues are
due to Python 3's new string/bytes incompatibility, and it takes a lot of
time to address these. Shall we continue over at #30946?
--
Ticket URL: <https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/32900#comment:2>
Tor Bug Tracker & Wiki <https://trac.torproject.org/>
The Tor Project: anonymity online
_______________________________________________
tor-bugs mailing list
tor-bugs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-bugs