[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]
Re: [tor-bugs] #6438 [Tor Client]: Evaluate software77's geoip database
#6438: Evaluate software77's geoip database
------------------------+---------------------------------------------------
Reporter: nickm | Owner:
Type: task | Status: new
Priority: normal | Milestone: Tor: 0.2.3.x-final
Component: Tor Client | Version:
Keywords: geoip | Parent: #6266
Points: | Actualpoints:
------------------------+---------------------------------------------------
Comment(by nickm):
Here are the results I got using the may geoip file currently in
src/config.
Looking at relay IPs currently in the microdesc consensus, it seems that
for 97.3% of them, software77 agrees with Maxmind, or has an opinion where
Maxmind did not. The ones where it differs are:
{{{
109.169.61.87 US => GB
109.73.160.179 IL => GB
138.199.69.233 NL => EU
142.4.33.231 CA => US
149.154.158.225 US => AT
176.31.132.137 GB => FR
176.31.15.236 GB => FR
176.31.64.252 IT => FR
176.31.69.74 GB => FR
176.31.9.77 GB => FR
178.17.48.136 IQ => DE
178.18.17.111 US => NL
178.18.254.11 US => DE
178.32.52.72 GB => FR
178.32.65.82 CZ => FR
178.33.169.35 GB => FR
178.33.32.123 DE => FR
178.33.33.209 DE => FR
188.165.24.70 LT => FR
188.165.73.221 IE => FR
192.71.245.137 IT => SE
194.14.179.62 IT => SE
194.150.168.79 EU => DE
194.150.168.95 EU => DE
195.5.121.253 NL => DE
199.36.123.104 CA => US
199.36.123.117 CA => US
199.36.123.21 CA => US
199.36.123.44 CA => US
199.36.123.88 CA => US
213.16.14.67 MQ => FR
216.12.198.82 SG => US
216.12.198.83 SG => US
216.12.198.84 SG => US
216.12.214.106 SG => US
37.205.9.131 CZ => SK
46.166.131.158 LU => GB
46.166.135.90 US => GB
46.166.146.152 RU => GB
46.166.146.194 RU => GB
46.166.159.35 DE => GB
46.166.159.51 DE => GB
46.166.159.52 DE => GB
46.166.159.53 DE => GB
46.166.159.54 DE => GB
46.166.159.55 DE => GB
46.166.159.56 DE => GB
46.166.159.57 DE => GB
46.166.159.58 DE => GB
46.166.159.59 DE => GB
46.166.159.90 DE => GB
46.166.159.91 DE => GB
46.166.159.92 DE => GB
46.21.151.71 US => NL
69.147.252.41 IN => US
69.195.211.198 CO => US
69.195.211.203 CO => US
69.90.151.229 CA => US
70.33.208.83 CA => US
74.120.12.135 DE => US
74.120.12.140 DE => US
74.120.13.132 DE => US
74.120.15.150 DE => US
81.58.10.210 NL => BE
82.146.49.65 US => RU
83.125.20.240 DE => EU
83.133.106.73 DE => EU
84.19.175.182 IT => DE
84.233.197.147 IT => GB
87.98.250.244 GB => FR
89.105.41.162 EU => NO
94.23.120.170 GB => FR
94.23.147.149 NL => FR
94.23.147.164 NL => FR
94.23.148.23 NL => FR
94.23.150.191 NL => FR
94.23.153.225 GB => FR
94.23.164.42 DE => FR
94.23.168.39 CZ => FR
94.23.168.56 CZ => FR
94.23.174.3 CZ => FR
0.973062853342
}}}
If I use the June geoip file instead, I get 96% agreement or improvement.
This doesn't seem to be a fluke; when I choose a large number of IPs
generated at random, I see about 98% agreement or improvement.
I'm attaching the script I used to do this test.
--
Ticket URL: <https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/6438#comment:3>
Tor Bug Tracker & Wiki <https://trac.torproject.org/>
The Tor Project: anonymity online
_______________________________________________
tor-bugs mailing list
tor-bugs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-bugs