[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: [tor-bugs] #5290 [Quality Assurance and Testing]: Collect+write test pages for JavaScript hooks

#5290: Collect+write test pages for JavaScript hooks
-------------------------------------------+--------------------------------
 Reporter:  mikeperry                      |          Owner:  cypherpunks                  
     Type:  task                           |         Status:  new                          
 Priority:  major                          |      Milestone:  TorBrowserBundle 2.3.x-stable
Component:  Quality Assurance and Testing  |        Version:                               
 Keywords:  MikePerry201208                |         Parent:  #5292                        
   Points:                                 |   Actualpoints:                               
-------------------------------------------+--------------------------------
Changes (by mikeperry):

  * keywords:  => MikePerry201208


Comment:

 gk: this is awesome. I am wondering two things: First, what made you pick
 mozmill over mochitest or xpcshell? Or for that matter, anything else out
 of https://developer.mozilla.org/en/Mozilla_automated_testing?

 Second, what do you propose we should do with this zip? Does Firefox have
 Makefile rules for mozmill we should use? I know it has xpcshell and
 Mochitest.. If Makefiles are a poor plan, should we create a new testing
 repo for stuff like this?

-- 
Ticket URL: <https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/5290#comment:11>
Tor Bug Tracker & Wiki <https://trac.torproject.org/>
The Tor Project: anonymity online
_______________________________________________
tor-bugs mailing list
tor-bugs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-bugs