[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]
Re: [tor-bugs] #16020 [Onionoo]: new field: measured flag
#16020: new field: measured flag
-----------------------------+-----------------
Reporter: cypherpunks | Owner:
Type: enhancement | Status: new
Priority: normal | Milestone:
Component: Onionoo | Version:
Resolution: | Keywords:
Actual Points: | Parent ID:
Points: |
-----------------------------+-----------------
Comment (by leeroy):
Oh, a spec I've not read. Thank you. Why's it hidden?
Visualizing measurements is off-topic. Providing the current measurements
data, from votes, just so someone can make graph is out of scope (unless
you want to change Onionoo's scope). Onionoo already provides the
Consensus Weight and Weights history document.
That being said as long as Onionoo doesn't try to build a history object
from archives (because that's bad news) it looks doable on an hourly
basis. If you really intend to expect an operator to parse votes archives
then Onionoo needs to make producing the bandwidth measurements optional
to setup.
To reinforce feasibility perhaps it would be better to test it first. An
extension of the previous parsing result would be "Parse the current
interval vote, obtain an !`Iterable` mapping fingerprint to set of
measurements", and see what kind of memory/time is required. Much better
than blindly hacking in new code. But it's up to you's.
--
Ticket URL: <https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/16020#comment:16>
Tor Bug Tracker & Wiki <https://trac.torproject.org/>
The Tor Project: anonymity online
_______________________________________________
tor-bugs mailing list
tor-bugs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-bugs