[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]
Re: [tor-bugs] #16255 [Tor]: Guardfraction on dirauths screws up bandwidth weights
#16255: Guardfraction on dirauths screws up bandwidth weights
-------------------------+-------------------------------------------------
Reporter: asn | Owner:
Type: defect | Status: needs_review
Priority: normal | Milestone: Tor: 0.2.7.x-final
Component: Tor | Version:
Resolution: | Keywords: tor-dirauth tor-guard,
Actual Points: | TorCoreTeam201507
Points: | Parent ID:
-------------------------+-------------------------------------------------
Changes (by asn):
* status: new => needs_review
Comment:
OK, I now have a branch `bug16255_027` which addresses the issues I found.
Specifically:
- We used to mess up the calculation of total bandwidth `T` when
guardfraction relays were considered. That's because we only updated `T`
with the guard bandwidth, and ignored the non-guard bandwidth. This should
be addressed in commit `79f6c49` and should fix the `Bw Weight Failure`
errors that blocked consensus weight creation.
- As authorities we used to throw warnings when verifying the bandwidths
of our own consensus, because we did not first apply the guardfraction
information. This commit fixes this by applying the guardfraction
information when parsing consensuses as authorities.
We should probably get this applied to most of authorities before turning
the feature on again.
I also prepared a backport branch for 0.2.6 diruahts `bug16255_026` that
only includes the first fix (which is very small), and can be used if we
want to try this feature on faster. Consensus weights should work with the
backport branch, but the authorities will issue a warning when verifying
their own consensus.
In general, it's a PITA testing bandwidth-related features with chutney
because the bandwidth values in a test network are nothing compared to
reality. Even without the above fixes, sometimes my chutney network will
generate consensus weights because the bandwidth values are so low it
doesn't even notice the `T` weight being off.
I'd appreciate a good review here and also pointer to other places in the
guardfraction design that could cause failures.
--
Ticket URL: <https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/16255#comment:7>
Tor Bug Tracker & Wiki <https://trac.torproject.org/>
The Tor Project: anonymity online
_______________________________________________
tor-bugs mailing list
tor-bugs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-bugs