[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]
Re: [tor-bugs] #19728 [Core Tor/Tor]: Pick, and deploy, a new bridge authority
#19728: Pick, and deploy, a new bridge authority
--------------------------+------------------------------------
Reporter: arma | Owner:
Type: task | Status: new
Priority: Medium | Milestone: Tor: 0.2.8.x-final
Component: Core Tor/Tor | Version:
Severity: Normal | Resolution:
Keywords: | Actual Points:
Parent ID: | Points:
Reviewer: | Sponsor:
--------------------------+------------------------------------
Comment (by arma):
Because of "Second", I am unexcited about putting the bridge authority
under the nose of any intelligence agency. Wherever we put it, it's a gift
to whoever's network it's on. So in that sense the *network* location is
at least as important as the security of the system itself. If somebody
can point us at a network location where no adversaries can watch, let us
know. :) Otherwise, it's about choosing which adversary to stick it next
to, and that is a crummy choice to have to make.
Because of "First", I think putting it nearby (in terms of trust) to
bridgedb or the metrics archiver makes a lot of sense.
Sebastian makes a good point above that "location stability" is a key
requirement for the bridge authority.
--
Ticket URL: <https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/19728#comment:3>
Tor Bug Tracker & Wiki <https://trac.torproject.org/>
The Tor Project: anonymity online
_______________________________________________
tor-bugs mailing list
tor-bugs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-bugs