[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]
Re: [tor-bugs] #3374 [Torouter]: Torouter OS and configuration
#3374: Torouter OS and configuration
----------------------+-----------------------------------------------------
Reporter: runa | Owner: runa
Type: task | Status: new
Priority: normal | Milestone:
Component: Torouter | Version:
Keywords: | Parent:
Points: | Actualpoints:
----------------------+-----------------------------------------------------
Comment(by runa):
Replying to [comment:35 ioerror]:
> Replying to [comment:33 runa]:
> > As far as I know, Tor 0.2.3.x breaks every few days and shipping
0.2.2.x is much saner. The Torouter is an experiment in getting non-tech
users to run bridges. I don't see how we need to complicate that with
shipping an experimental version of Tor. There are enough people out there
who can help test 0.2.3.x when it's ready for testing in the wild. And at
some point we can also include it on the Torouter. I just don't think now
is a good time. if anyone wants to want to convince me otherwise, go for
it... :)
>
> How do you propose that we open ports in a NAT device without tor-fw-
helper?
Users will have to open ports in their NAT devices manually, which is what
they have done so far (and will have to do with the B3 as well). I think
it would be great to ship with tor-fw-helper, but I am worried that 0.2.3
is too unstable for non-tech users.
--
Ticket URL: <https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/3374#comment:39>
Tor Bug Tracker & Wiki <https://trac.torproject.org/>
The Tor Project: anonymity online
_______________________________________________
tor-bugs mailing list
tor-bugs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-bugs