[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]
Re: [tor-bugs] #12891 [Tor]: Simulate KIST - global scheduling (#9262) and socket write limits (#12890)
#12891: Simulate KIST - global scheduling (#9262) and socket write limits (#12890)
----------------------------+------------------------------------------
Reporter: robgjansen | Owner:
Type: task | Status: assigned
Priority: normal | Milestone: Tor: 0.2.???
Component: Tor | Version:
Resolution: | Keywords: tor-relay, 027-triaged-1-out
Actual Points: | Parent ID: #12541
Points: |
----------------------------+------------------------------------------
Comment (by robgjansen):
I believe the results I posted above are invalid. I recently found and
fixed several bugs in Shadow which affected network performance, and
created a more recent model of Tor that we were using for our peerflow
experiments. I have higher confidence in this model after running many
many experiments with it and analyzing results obtained with it.
I compared Torperf performance in Tor vs in Shadow with my new fancy
model. Those
[https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/attachment/ticket/12891
/shadowtorperf-ideal-model-from-ccs-peerflow.pdf results are attached
here]. It appears that Shadow is again tracking Tor performance nicely. (I
believe the difference in time to first byte is because Karsten and I are
starting our download timers at different points, which we just realized
this week.)
--
Ticket URL: <https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/12891#comment:11>
Tor Bug Tracker & Wiki <https://trac.torproject.org/>
The Tor Project: anonymity online
_______________________________________________
tor-bugs mailing list
tor-bugs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-bugs